Difference between revisions of "Projects"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "=Downstream tasks= * Above-ground biomass estimation in Finland * Peat depths in Scotland") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Downstream tasks= | =Downstream tasks= | ||
| + | * Borneo Canopy Height Model, with ground truth from ALS scans collected by David Coomes's group | ||
| + | * Test accuracy of crop classification from the crop dataset for an important agricultural production region in Austria (the so-called ‘Marchfeld’), characterised by a large number of crops in widely different field sizes. | ||
| + | * Compare forest AGB in Para state with the results computed by Mantle (RSE paper) | ||
| + | * Compare CHM in California with CHM obtained from ALS scans | ||
| + | * Compare burn scars in Sierra Nevada in California with ground truth labels from PANGAEA/US Forestry Service | ||
* [[Above-ground biomass estimation in Finland]] | * [[Above-ground biomass estimation in Finland]] | ||
* [[Peat depths in Scotland]] | * [[Peat depths in Scotland]] | ||
Revision as of 10:50, 11 September 2025
Downstream tasks
- Borneo Canopy Height Model, with ground truth from ALS scans collected by David Coomes's group
- Test accuracy of crop classification from the crop dataset for an important agricultural production region in Austria (the so-called ‘Marchfeld’), characterised by a large number of crops in widely different field sizes.
- Compare forest AGB in Para state with the results computed by Mantle (RSE paper)
- Compare CHM in California with CHM obtained from ALS scans
- Compare burn scars in Sierra Nevada in California with ground truth labels from PANGAEA/US Forestry Service
- Above-ground biomass estimation in Finland
- Peat depths in Scotland
